PPAP (pronounced P-PAP) is a manufacturing inspection process used to verify a supplier's ability to reliably and repeatedly produce a part or components for mass production.
PPAP validates a production process by inspecting parts before, during, and after a production run.
The PPAP report reviews 18 requirements: design records, authorized engineering changes, engineering approval, dimensional results, control plan, and more.
PPAP is part of the 5 Core Quality Tools for effective quality management with APQP, FMEA, MSA, and SPC being the other core tools. PPAP is mandated in some industries like automotive and aerospace.
Purpose of PPAP:
- Validating supplier’s ability.
- Understanding customer requirements.
- Establishing a reliable and repeatable process & agreement.
- Reducing cost and having faster time to market.
- Maintaining expectations & compliance on both sides.
PPAP is important for these three factors:
The manufacturing industry is highly competitive. Reducing cost, increasing faster time to market, and maintaining or improving quality are three tenets of any successful company.
Getting quality parts done right and taking corrective action earlier in the lifecycle saves significantly more time and money when compared to rework, scrap, and the dreaded recall.
Every manufacturer aims for a reliable and repeatable process, and PPAP enforces that standard.
Common problems PPAP detects:
- Wrong or poor production process (e.g. equipment).
- Incorrect or ambiguous product design.
- Wrong or inconsistent quality of material.
- Inconsistent quality control.
Suppliers or the production team create the PPAP report for the customer to review.
After the manufacturer designs a product, manufacturing the parts is outsourced to suppliers and their sub-suppliers. Suppliers create PPAP reports to show that their parts meet specs, requirements, and functions as intended.
The manufacturing quality or engineering team reviews the PPAP package for approval. If approved, suppliers can begin mass production. If not, suppliers must make corrections and resubmit.
While the responsibility for creating and submitting PPAP falls on the supplier, the process is usually done closely with the manufacturer's quality team.
PPAP is typically required for the production of new parts or when there is a change to the product or process:
The PPAP report reviews 18 requirements called elements.
The PPAP report has 5 levels of submissions with Level 3 as the default level of PPAP submission approval.
PPAP Retention and Submission Requirements Table | ||||||
Requirements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |
1. Design Record | R | S | S | * | R | |
- for proprietary components/details |
R |
R | R | * | R | |
- for all other components/details | R | S | S | * | R | |
2. Engineering Change Documents | R | S | S | * | R | |
3. Customer Engineering Approval | R | R | S | * | R | |
4. Design FMEA | R | R | S | * | R | |
5. Process Flow Diagrams | R | R | S | * | R | |
6. Process FMEA | R | R | S | * | R | |
7. Control Plan | R | R | S | * | R | |
8. Measurement System Analysis | R | R | S | * | R | |
9. Dimensional Results | R | S | S | * | R | |
10. Material, Performance Test Results | R | S | S | * | R | |
11. Initial Process Studies | R | R | S | * | R | |
12. Qualified Laboratory Documentation | R | S | S | * | R | |
13. Appearance Approval Report | S | S | S | * | R | |
14. Sample Report | R | S | S | * | R | |
15. Master Sample | R | R | R | * | R | |
16. Checking Aids | R | R | R | * | R | |
17. Records of Compliance w/ Customer-Specific Requirements | R | R | S | * | R | |
18. Part Submission Warrant (PSW) | Bulk Material Checklist | S | S | S | * | R | |
S = Organization must submit to the customer and retain a copy of records or documentation items at appropriate locations. R = Organization must retain at appropriate locations and make available to the customer upon request.
|
The Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) has a common PPAP standard, although individual OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) may establish their unique requirements.
AIAG memberships includes Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Volkswagen, Caterpillar, and over 800 OEMs, parts manufacturers, and service providers.
Although primarily used in the automotive industry, other industries such as aerospace & defense, consumer goods, heavy industries, medical, electronics, and more have quickly adopted PPAP or an adaptation of it.
The PPAP manual, now in its 4th edition, was last published in March 2006.
PPAP isn't easy.
Especially with manually generating PPAP reports.
However, a model-based definition (MBD) approach to PPAP can drastically reduce time and errors through automatic ballooning and measurement results.
MBD is a growing industry practice of having the 3D CAD model be the “single source of truth.”
This means the CAD model and semantic product and manufacturing information (PMI) can drive the PPAP report, GD&T, bill of materials, notes, engineering change orders, etc., for an improved method of inspection generation through automating manual processes.
The true strength of MBD-based PPAP is the human and machine readability factor. With 2D drawings, data is for human consumption, presenting two major problems: reliance on human process & interpretation and underutilized data.
Learn more about MBD PPAP Download: MBD-Based Inspection Reporting PDF
For example, if a large company with multiple suppliers receives the same drawing, most likely, the company will get back 5 different PPAP documents with varying GD&T interpretations from the suppliers.
Not the headache OEMs want to deal with.
MBD-based PPAP coming from the company first establishes the specification of the process and product more explicitly, ensuring uniformity between different suppliers.
Also, quality and inspection teams are often viewed as pass/fail departments, yet they have valuable data that can help improve business products and problems.
MBD reintroduces data into the ecosystem for improved designs, parts, and operations done quicker, cheaper, and more efficiently.
MBD PPAP Benefits:
- Automated: No need for human transcription or interpretation.
- Build and optimize a reliable and repeatable process.
- Data mapped back to the single source of truth.
- Start of the digital transformation from design to manufacturing.
- Valuable data to mined for analytics and business insights.
GE Appliances is a 100% model-based definition (MBD) company and, in a LiveWorx 2023 presentation, listed many of the benefits of going fully digital.
One benefit was that by automating PPAP with MBDVidia, GEA reduced PPAP report generation errors by 77%.
Contact us and we'll glad to help answer questions PPAP, FAI, or inspection programs.
How MBDVidia for MBD PPAP works
MBDVidia: Automatic BoC generation for PPAP, FAI, and other inspection reports.